Melky Cabrera has been the centerpiece of most Yankee offers at the trade deadline which makes sense considering he is a 3rd to 4th OF and Austin Jackson, the number one ranked prospect in the Yankees' system according to Baseball America, seems like he will be ready by mid-2009, so why not sell on Melky when his value is about as high as it will get.
Yet what I do not get is why insist that Melky be in a deal instead of Brett Gardner. ESPN's trade blog and several threads on ProSportsDaily.com are reporting the Yankees rather put Melky in a deal than Gardner in an offer to Seattle. ESPN is also reporting the Yankees turned down a deal that would land them Washburn for both young OFs, while the Mariners have no interest in Kei Igawa, the Japanese SP (who sucks and was a total reactionary pick up to Boston getting Dice-K) who the Yankees want to center a deal around. Cashman has been given the go ahead to pick up Washburn's salary over the next two years by Hank and Co. Cashman wants this to be the centerpiece of the deal, the absorption of the contract, not young prospects.
Getting back to the point, why deal Melky when you could deal Garnder? If an offer of Gardner and Igawa would get the deal done (which I cannot say it can considering I have no sources beside and ESPN Insider subscription) why not do it? Like I've written before, Gardner sucks. He would make make an excellent women's softball player with his quick swing and ability to get down the line quickly yet I do not think he would have the power to hit one over the 220 foot fence. Melky has a better arm, covers about the same ground in center (thanks to a great first step and ability to judge fly balls - not pure speed), and is a year younger than Gardner. He is also a switch-hitter who has proven to be only a below average hitter, not a fully incompetent one like Gardner (this may be a tough statement considering Gardner got 70+ ABs but he really looked like he had no clue at the plat taking countless pitches for strikes to fall into pitcher's counts). Plus, Melky had a decent year when he was 21, and as Rob Neyer notes, there is little precedent for players peaking at such a young age.
The deal I would do if I was the Yankees would be to offer Melky for Brian Bannister. The Yankees' interest in the 27 year old Royals starting pitcher has been noted. Neyer (a Royals' fan) wrote that the Royals would have to accept that deal. As a Yankee fan, I think that would be a huge steal for the Yankees. Bannister, who started his career with the Mets, could be a legit 3rd starter. He is having a disappointing year so far, but last year he had a 3.87 ERA, a 1.21 WHIP, and a 4.20 K/9. Without doing much research I would rather him than Washburn, especially as he making less than half a million dollars and about 40k less than Melky. He will be eligigle for super-two arbitration, but will make nowhere near the 10+ million that Washburn will make next year. If the Royals would accept this offer, then by all means, I would make this trade. And if they would take Gardner instead then that would be even better.